Thread:User talk:Danny/Posters look like ads/reply (6)

Reading the DSM5 now? You decided your views on OSDD months ago and have edited on that basis which leaves a lot of reverts to do. I added the full DSM5 criteria but the explanatory notes in the books add more. What used to be DDNOS 1-b is still clearly covered in OSDD presentation 1 but is not part of SD. The amnesia part differs in significant ways. The additional notes for DID amnesia differ significantly between the DSM5 and SD, with the DSM5 giving 3 examples in the additional notes (for DID). The description of personality states differs, the additional explanation about the DID criteria expand on this further in some detail. Not once are any words associated with "apparently normal" or "daily life" roles used in the DSM5. You can now preview the full DSM5 book online as well as the DSM5 guidebook, also published by the APA, its very, very clearly. Nothing in the DSM5 workgroup research refers to SD so the DSM workgroup's views are unknown. SD is an evolving model. The DSM can only published what is well verified (i.e., well known and studied). It doesn't mean the DSM worksgroup disagree. It only means there is not enough evidence yet, although I suspect DSM 5.1 or DSM 5.2 will discuss this (these are the minor releases planned, DSM-V was binned a name because DSM-V.1 did not make a sensible name for a minor release).

An image of a mind I fixed for you by renaming would have been perfect for the OSDD page but has now been deleted. I could not find anything under creative commons licenses at the weekend that was suitable. Schlumpf et al. (2014) can't be used since the caption refers to "DIDanp" not "ANP" or "OSDDanp" or any other time that suggests OSDD. The Method states how many people with DID were in the study and that none had OSDD.

OSDD needs expanding to cover the non-DID type that lasts longest, the one most similar to Complex PTSD and the Dissociative subtype of PTSD combined. There's a lot published on concentration camp survivors/political prisoners to draw from, especially from the JTS.